Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jurado-Gonzalez, 99-40275 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-40275 Visitors: 170
Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40275 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO JURADO-GONZALEZ, also known as Jaime Ramirez-Gaspar, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-98-CR-815-ALL-S - - - - - - - - - - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appointed counsel for Roberto Jurad
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 99-40275
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO JURADO-GONZALEZ,
also known as Jaime Ramirez-Gaspar,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                   USDC No. L-98-CR-815-ALL-S
                       - - - - - - - - - -

                         December 15, 1999

 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appointed counsel for Roberto Jurado-Gonzalez (“Jurado”),

has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders

v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 744 (1967).     Jurado has received a

copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.

Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue.   Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 99-40275
                               -2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer