Filed: May 09, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 99-10384 ANTHONY C. AYERS, ERNEST R. KING, DENSHIA MOORE, JOSEPH C. WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellee _ No. 99-11006 _ ANTHONY C. AYERS; ET AL., Plaintiffs, MAELISSA R.M. WATSON, Appellant, OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas (3:95-
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 99-10384 ANTHONY C. AYERS, ERNEST R. KING, DENSHIA MOORE, JOSEPH C. WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellee _ No. 99-11006 _ ANTHONY C. AYERS; ET AL., Plaintiffs, MAELISSA R.M. WATSON, Appellant, OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas (3:95-C..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 99-10384 ANTHONY C. AYERS, ERNEST R. KING, DENSHIA MOORE, JOSEPH C. WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellee _________________________________ No. 99-11006 _________________________________ ANTHONY C. AYERS; ET AL., Plaintiffs, MAELISSA R.M. WATSON, Appellant, OIL, CHEMICAL & ATOMIC WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas (3:95-CV-2754-R) May 5, 2000 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the record and considering the argument and briefs of counsel, we are satisfied that the district court committed no error in this case. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2
