Edwards v. Alamo Rent A Car Inc, 99-11102 (2000)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 99-11102
Visitors: 27
Filed: Dec. 08, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-11102 _ ALLYSON EDWARDS Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALAMO RENT A CAR, INC.; BRYAN BENSON, in his Official Capacity for Alamo Rent A Car, Inc. and Individually for State Common Law Claims Defendants - Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:97-CV-2661-R) _ December 8, 2000 Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* AFFIRMED. See 5th Circuit Rul
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-11102 _ ALLYSON EDWARDS Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALAMO RENT A CAR, INC.; BRYAN BENSON, in his Official Capacity for Alamo Rent A Car, Inc. and Individually for State Common Law Claims Defendants - Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:97-CV-2661-R) _ December 8, 2000 Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* AFFIRMED. See 5th Circuit Rule..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ______________________ No. 99-11102 ______________________ ALLYSON EDWARDS Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALAMO RENT A CAR, INC.; BRYAN BENSON, in his Official Capacity for Alamo Rent A Car, Inc. and Individually for State Common Law Claims Defendants - Appellees. _____________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:97-CV-2661-R) _____________________________________________________________________ December 8, 2000 Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* AFFIRMED. See 5th Circuit Rule 47.6. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener