Filed: Apr. 26, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-60485 Summary Calendar _ AMIN AMIR ALI, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A73-188-551 - April 24, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Amin Amir Ali petitions this court to review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal seeking rever
Summary: No. -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-60485 Summary Calendar _ AMIN AMIR ALI, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A73-188-551 - April 24, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Amin Amir Ali petitions this court to review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal seeking revers..
More
No.
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 99-60485
Summary Calendar
__________________
AMIN AMIR ALI,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A73-188-551
--------------------
April 24, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Amin Amir Ali petitions this court to review an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal
seeking reversal of an order of removal and denying his
applications for political asylum and voluntary departure. We
have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the
BIA’s denial of Ali’s applications for asylum and voluntary
departure is supported by substantial evidence. Faddoul v. INS,
37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994).
The petition for review is DENIED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.