Filed: Apr. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-60492 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-60492 Conference Calendar _ JOHNATHAN O. FAGBEMI, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A29 856 892 - Apr8il 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Johnathan O. Fagbemi petitions for review of the order of the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal f
Summary: No. 99-60492 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-60492 Conference Calendar _ JOHNATHAN O. FAGBEMI, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A29 856 892 - Apr8il 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Johnathan O. Fagbemi petitions for review of the order of the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal fr..
More
No. 99-60492
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 99-60492
Conference Calendar
__________________
JOHNATHAN O. FAGBEMI,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A29 856 892
--------------------
Apr8il 13, 2000
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Johnathan O. Fagbemi petitions for review of the order of
the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal
from the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) that denied his
application for asylum and withholding of deportation. Fagbemi
contends that the BIA erred by dismissing his appeal because the
IJ denied his motion for a change of venue. Fagbemi has not
shown that the IJ abused his discretion by denying the motion.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.
47.5.4.
No. 99-60492
-2-
Kin Sang Chow v. INS,
12 F.3d 34, 39 (5th Cir. 1993). Fagbemi
also asserts that he was wrongly denied relief from removal. The
decision of the IJ and BIA that Fagbemi was not eligible for
asylum or withholding of deportation is supported by substantial
evidence in the record. Faddoul v. INS,
37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th
Cir. 1994).
Fagbemi’s motions for discovery, to compel, to enter default
judgment, and for a subpoena are DENIED.
PETITION DENIED; MOTIONS DENIED.