Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Veeck v. Southern Bldg Code, 99-40632 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-40632 Visitors: 32
Filed: Oct. 01, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 268 F.3d 298 (5th Cir. 2001) PETER VEECK, doing business as RegionalWeb, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant v. SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL INC, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee No. 99-40632 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT September 27, 2001 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion February 2, 2001, 5 Cir., 2001, 241 F.3d 398 ) Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHA
More

268 F.3d 298 (5th Cir. 2001)

PETER VEECK, doing business as RegionalWeb, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant
v.
SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL INC, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee

No. 99-40632

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

September 27, 2001

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion February 2, 2001, 5 Cir., 2001, 241 F.3d 398)

Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer