Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Ishup, 01-20524 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-20524 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 31, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20524 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BILLY RAY ISHUP, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-584-1 - October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Billy Ray Ishup appeals his conviction for distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, which he contends i
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 01-20524
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BILLY RAY ISHUP,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. H-00-CR-584-1
                      --------------------
                        October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Billy Ray Ishup appeals his conviction for distribution of

cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, which he contends

is unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).    Ishup concedes that this argument is foreclosed.

See United States v. Slaughter, 
238 F.3d 580
, 582 (5th Cir.

2000), cert. denied., 
532 U.S. 1045
(2001).    He seeks to preserve




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 01-20524
                               -2-

his argument for Supreme Court review.   The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer