Filed: Nov. 19, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-60573 _ CHARLES DAVIDSON, doing business as Davidson Farms, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANN VENEMAN, Secretary Department of Agriculture, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:96-CV-95-BiS November 18, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: After due consideration, we find that we do not have jurisdiction over al
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-60573 _ CHARLES DAVIDSON, doing business as Davidson Farms, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANN VENEMAN, Secretary Department of Agriculture, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:96-CV-95-BiS November 18, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: After due consideration, we find that we do not have jurisdiction over all..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-60573
____________
CHARLES DAVIDSON, doing business as Davidson Farms,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ANN VENEMAN, Secretary Department of Agriculture,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 5:96-CV-95-BiS
November 18, 2002
Before KING, Chief Judge, JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
After due consideration, we find that we do not have jurisdiction over all of the issues briefed
in this case because the district court denied Davidson’s “motion for summary judgment awarding
interest.” The interest issue has not been finally litigated in the district court. We are a court of
limited jurisdiction, and a denial of summary judgment is not a final judgment. Palmer v. Johnson,
193 F.3d 346, 350 (5th Cir. 1999).
We remand to the district court solely to decide this remaining issue and enter a final
judgment. The clerk of this court is directed to return the record to the district court. Within sixty
days after entry of this remand, the district court shall enter judgment. Once the district court has
entered judgment, the clerk of the district court shall return the record, supplemented with the
judgment, to this court for disposition of the appeal by this panel. The parties are not required to file
a new notice of appeal, nor is further briefing required.
For the foregoing reasons, we retain jurisdiction over this appeal and REMAND to the district
court for proceedings consistent with this order.