Filed: Jun. 07, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60767 Summary Calendar ABDEL QADER HAMAD, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A29 916 089 - June 6, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Abdel Qader Hamad petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's decision
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60767 Summary Calendar ABDEL QADER HAMAD, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A29 916 089 - June 6, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Abdel Qader Hamad petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's decision t..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-60767
Summary Calendar
ABDEL QADER HAMAD,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A29 916 089
--------------------
June 6, 2002
Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Abdel Qader Hamad petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals' decision dismissing his appeal from the
immigration judge's decision to deny his application for asylum and
for a withholding of deportation. He argues that the Board erred
by determining that he did not have a well-founded fear of future
persecution in Kuwait. We have reviewed the record and the briefs
and determine that the Board's decision is supported by substantial
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-60767
-2-
evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS,
78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir.
1996). The petition for review is DENIED.
DENIED.