Filed: Mar. 13, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-11115 Summary Calendar LOUIS CHARLES SHEPTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS LESTER FLEMING, Warden, Federal Medical Center-Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the North District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CV-533-A March 12, 2003 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Louis Charles Sheptin, federal inmate # 90355-024, appeals the dismissal of his petition for habeas
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-11115 Summary Calendar LOUIS CHARLES SHEPTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS LESTER FLEMING, Warden, Federal Medical Center-Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the North District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CV-533-A March 12, 2003 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Louis Charles Sheptin, federal inmate # 90355-024, appeals the dismissal of his petition for habeas r..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-11115
Summary Calendar
LOUIS CHARLES SHEPTIN,
Petitioner-Appellant,
VERSUS
LESTER FLEMING, Warden, Federal Medical Center-Fort Worth,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the North District of Texas
USDC No. 4:02-CV-533-A
March 12, 2003
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Louis Charles Sheptin, federal inmate # 90355-024, appeals the
dismissal of his petition for habeas relief, filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241, in which he alleged that he was entitled to
sentence credit for time served while he was an escapee. The
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
district court dismissed Sheptin’s petition because he failed to
exhaust his administrative remedies. Sheptin has waived the only
appellate issue by failing to brief it. Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d
222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9)(A) and (B).
Sheptin’s motion to supplement his brief is DENIED. The
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Sheptin’s motion for
the appointment of counsel is also DENIED.
G:\OPIN-SC\02-11115.opn.wpd 2