Filed: Oct. 21, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10502 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AGUSTIN PEREZ-AMBROSIO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-64-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public De
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10502 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AGUSTIN PEREZ-AMBROSIO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-64-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Def..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-10502
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
AGUSTIN PEREZ-AMBROSIO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:02-CR-64-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for
Agustin Perez-Ambrosio, has requested leave to withdraw from this
appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Perez-Ambrosio has received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-10502
-2-
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED.