Filed: Nov. 06, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 6, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-50172 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NORBERTO LOPEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-02-CR-234 - Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Norberto Lope
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 6, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-50172 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NORBERTO LOPEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-02-CR-234 - Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Norberto Lopez..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 6, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-50172
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NORBERTO LOPEZ-LOPEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-02-CR-234
--------------------
Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Norberto Lopez-Lopez (Lopez)
has moved for leave to withdraw from this direct appeal and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Lopez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief
and has filed a response but raises no potentially non-frivolous
issue therein. Our independent review of the brief and the record
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
discloses no non-frivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2