Horton v. City of Houston, 03-20450 (2004)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 03-20450
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 17, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit March 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20450 ROBERT HORTON; NATIONALIST TELEVISION, a Texas Non-Profit Corporation; BARRY HACKNEY, Plaintiffs-Appellants VERSUS CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS; ACCESS HOUSTON CABLE CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas H-92-CV-3451 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and DeMOSS, Circuit Judg
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit March 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20450 ROBERT HORTON; NATIONALIST TELEVISION, a Texas Non-Profit Corporation; BARRY HACKNEY, Plaintiffs-Appellants VERSUS CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS; ACCESS HOUSTON CABLE CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas H-92-CV-3451 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and DeMOSS, Circuit Judge..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit March 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-20450 ROBERT HORTON; NATIONALIST TELEVISION, a Texas Non-Profit Corporation; BARRY HACKNEY, Plaintiffs-Appellants VERSUS CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS; ACCESS HOUSTON CABLE CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas H-92-CV-3451 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the record created on remand and considering the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we are satisfied that the district court properly carried out our remand instructions. We also conclude that the district court did not err in concluding that the fee in question was narrowly tailored to * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. achieve the legitimate objective of promoting localism. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. AFFIRMED. 2
Source: CourtListener
