Filed: Jun. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41750 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN MISAEL VERGARA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-879-ALL - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, app
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41750 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN MISAEL VERGARA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-879-ALL - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, appo..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-41750
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN MISAEL VERGARA-GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-879-ALL
--------------------
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Juan
Misael Vergara-Gonzalez (Vergara-Gonzalez) on appeal, has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vergara-Gonzalez has
not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review
of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.