Filed: Sep. 08, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-11199 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADAN ANDRADE GOMEZ, also known as Adan Gomez, also known as Andres Martinez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-87-ALL - Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judg
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-11199 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADAN ANDRADE GOMEZ, also known as Adan Gomez, also known as Andres Martinez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-87-ALL - Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judge..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT September 8, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-11199
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ADAN ANDRADE GOMEZ, also known as Adan Gomez,
also known as Andres Martinez,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:05-CR-87-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Adan Andrade
Gomez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres
v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8
U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate
criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance
is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.