Filed: May 22, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 22, 2006 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-60274 Summary Calendar BENJAMIN JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VICKI HARE; AUTUMN ZACHARIAS, Bad Check Unit, Office of the District Attorney; WHBQ TELEVISION, Channel 13, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi No. 2:05-CV-24 - Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circ
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 22, 2006 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-60274 Summary Calendar BENJAMIN JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VICKI HARE; AUTUMN ZACHARIAS, Bad Check Unit, Office of the District Attorney; WHBQ TELEVISION, Channel 13, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi No. 2:05-CV-24 - Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circu..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
May 22, 2006
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-60274
Summary Calendar
BENJAMIN JOHNSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VICKI HARE; AUTUMN ZACHARIAS, Bad Check Unit, Office of the
District Attorney; WHBQ TELEVISION, Channel 13,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
No. 2:05-CV-24
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Benjamin Johnson, federal prisoner # 19553-076, appeals the district court’s dismissal
of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice. The district court based its dismissal on
its conclusion that the case could not proceed in an orderly and timely manner because
Johnson was incarcerated in another state. Johnson argues that this conclusion is erroneous
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
and that the district court’s decision impinges on his right to due process and the timely
pursuit of his claims.
“Prisoners retain a right of adequate, effective, and meaningful access to the courts.”
Roberson v. Hewes,
701 F.2d 418, 420 (5th Cir. 1983). In the absence of a factual basis for
concluding that Johnson could not effectively maintain his civil rights action, the district
court erred in dismissing it. See id.; Mitchum v. Purvis,
650 F.2d 647, 648 (5th Cir. Unit B
July 1981). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the matter is
remanded for further proceedings.
VACATED AND REMANDED.