Filed: Jan. 23, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 23, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10294 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERICK DEVUN HAYNES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-372-ALL-R - Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 23, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10294 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERICK DEVUN HAYNES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-372-ALL-R - Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed t..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 23, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-10294
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DERICK DEVUN HAYNES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:03-CR-372-ALL-R
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derick
Devun Haynes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Haynes has filed a response in which he requests the appointment of
new counsel. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the
record, and Haynes’ response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-10294
-2-
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Haynes’ motion
for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.