Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41810 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILSON LOCKE LYNCH, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-69 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41810 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILSON LOCKE LYNCH, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-69 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41810
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILSON LOCKE LYNCH, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-69
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Wilson Locke Lynch, Jr.,
has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lynch has not
responded. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s
brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.