Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Stewart, 05-50995 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-50995 Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-50995 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REBECCA GAYLE STEWART, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-8-2 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 14, 2007

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                             No. 05-50995                          Clerk
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REBECCA GAYLE STEWART,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                        USDC No. 4:05-CR-8-2
                        --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Rebecca Gayle Stewart

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Stewart has not filed a response to counsel’s motion.       Our

independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.       See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer