Filed: Jun. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41240 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAUL CALZADIAS, also known as Robert Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-217 - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Fed
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-41240 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAUL CALZADIAS, also known as Robert Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-217 - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Fede..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-41240
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAUL CALZADIAS, also known as Robert Garcia,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:05-CR-217
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul
Calzadias has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Calzadias has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.