Filed: Nov. 21, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 21, 2007 No. 07-10113 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk NORMAN E. ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN COLE JETER, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CV-824 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Norman E. Robinson, federal prisoner # 04307-003, was c
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 21, 2007 No. 07-10113 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk NORMAN E. ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN COLE JETER, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CV-824 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Norman E. Robinson, federal prisoner # 04307-003, was co..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 21, 2007
No. 07-10113
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
NORMAN E. ROBINSON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN COLE JETER,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:06-CV-824
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Norman E. Robinson, federal prisoner # 04307-003, was convicted and
sentenced for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and phenylacetone.
Robinson now appeals the district court’s dismissal of his § 2241 petition in
which he challenged the validity of his indictment on the basis that it did not
allege the quantity of drugs for which he was sentenced. The district court
dismissed the petition, finding that Robinson was attempting to collaterally
attack his conviction and sentence and that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was therefore the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-10113
correct procedural vehicle for Robinson’s claims. Because Robinson challenges
the validity of his sentence in his § 2241 petition but has failed to demonstrate
that his claims fall within the “savings clause” of § 2255, the district court did
not err in dismissing his § 2241 petition. See Reyes-Requena v. United States,
243 F.3d 893, 901-04 (5th Cir. 2001); Pack v. Yusuff,
218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir.
2000).
AFFIRMED.
2