Mrne Elec Solutions v. Darr, 07-30114 (2007)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 07-30114
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 13, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 13, 2007 No. 07-30114 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MARINE ELECTRONICS SOLUTIONS INC; M E S INSTALLATIONS INC; DONNA PENNEY; CLAY MAZYCK Plaintiffs - Appellees v. DAVID DARR Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans No. 2:06-CV-3415 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We AFF
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 13, 2007 No. 07-30114 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MARINE ELECTRONICS SOLUTIONS INC; M E S INSTALLATIONS INC; DONNA PENNEY; CLAY MAZYCK Plaintiffs - Appellees v. DAVID DARR Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans No. 2:06-CV-3415 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We AFFI..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 13, 2007 No. 07-30114 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk MARINE ELECTRONICS SOLUTIONS INC; M E S INSTALLATIONS INC; DONNA PENNEY; CLAY MAZYCK Plaintiffs - Appellees v. DAVID DARR Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans No. 2:06-CV-3415 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We AFFIRM the district court’s Judgment of Permanent Injunction entered August 31, 2006, except insofar as it precludes defendant-appellant David Darr from litigating in state court his claim that the Marital Settlement Agreement is a binding shareholder agreement under Florida law. We have ordered that claim remanded to state court. The district court’s permanent injunction is VACATED with respect to that claim. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-30114 AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART. Darr shall bear the costs of this appeal. 2
Source: CourtListener
