Filed: Dec. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 5, 2007 No. 07-40752 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. SANTIAGO CASTILLO-LUCIO, also known as Edgar Santiago Castillo-Lucio Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-47-ALL Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* A
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 5, 2007 No. 07-40752 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. SANTIAGO CASTILLO-LUCIO, also known as Edgar Santiago Castillo-Lucio Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CR-47-ALL Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ap..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 5, 2007
No. 07-40752
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SANTIAGO CASTILLO-LUCIO, also known as Edgar Santiago Castillo-Lucio
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:07-CR-47-ALL
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Santiago Castillo-Lucio
raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Galvan-Rodriguez,
169 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 1999), and Brevia-Perez v. Gonzales,
482 F.3d 356,
(5th Cir. 2007), which held that the offense of unauthorized use of a motor
vehicle is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). The appellant’s motion for
summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.