Filed: Dec. 10, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 10, 2008 No. 08-50230 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk LEVI REED, JR Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAN ANTONIO AEROSPACE, LP Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CV-186 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Levi Reed, Jr., moves this court for leave to proceed in forma p
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 10, 2008 No. 08-50230 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk LEVI REED, JR Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAN ANTONIO AEROSPACE, LP Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CV-186 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Levi Reed, Jr., moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pa..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 10, 2008
No. 08-50230
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
LEVI REED, JR
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
SAN ANTONIO AEROSPACE, LP
Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:05-CV-186
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Levi Reed, Jr., moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
(IFP) on appeal from the summary-judgment dismissal of his employment
discrimination lawsuit. By moving for IFP, Reed challenges the district court’s
certification that the appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor,
117
F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-50230
Reed has abandoned by failing to brief any argument challenging the
district court’s reasons for dismissing his lawsuit. See Brinkmann v. Dallas
County Deputy Sheriff Abner,
813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Reed thus has
not shown that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Howard v.
King,
707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the motion for leave to
proceed IFP is denied, and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See
Baugh, 117
F.3d at 202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
2