Filed: Jun. 16, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2009 No. 08-40100 c/w No. 08-40106 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JULIAN DE JESUS CASTILLO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:02-CR-696-1 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Julian De Jesus Castillo appeals t
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2009 No. 08-40100 c/w No. 08-40106 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JULIAN DE JESUS CASTILLO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:02-CR-696-1 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Julian De Jesus Castillo appeals th..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 16, 2009
No. 08-40100
c/w No. 08-40106 Charles R. Fulbruge III
Conference Calendar Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JULIAN DE JESUS CASTILLO
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:02-CR-696-1
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Julian De Jesus Castillo appeals the revocation of his supervised release.
He contends that the district court unlawfully revoked supervised release based
on hearsay evidence adduced in violation of his limited right to confront adverse
witnesses. Castillo has served the term of imprisonment imposed upon
revocation, and the district court imposed no further term of supervised release.
Therefore, Castillo has no “concrete and continuing injury,” and there is no case
*
Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-40100
c/w No. 08-40106
or controversy over which this court may exercise jurisdiction under Article III,
§ 2, of the Constitution. Spencer v. Kemna,
523 U.S. 1, 7, 14 (1998). His appeal
is DISMISSED as moot.
2