Filed: Oct. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-30003 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KENNETH J. CLARK, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:08-CR-148-2 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Kenneth J. Cl
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 20, 2009 No. 09-30003 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KENNETH J. CLARK, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:08-CR-148-2 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Kenneth J. Cla..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 20, 2009
No. 09-30003
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
KENNETH J. CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 6:08-CR-148-2
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Kenneth J. Clark has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Clark has filed a response. Our independent review of the
record, counsel’s brief, and Clark’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.