Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jose Ortiz, 09-40686 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 09-40686 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 19, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-40686 Document: 00511084108 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 19, 2010 No. 09-40686 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-257-1 Before BENAVIDES, PRADO and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The F
More
     Case: 09-40686     Document: 00511084108          Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/19/2010




            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                     FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                  FILED
                                                                            April 19, 2010
                                     No. 09-40686
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ORTIZ,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:05-CR-257-1


Before BENAVIDES, PRADO and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Ortiz has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Ortiz has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

        *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer