Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Heath Hill, 10-30013 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 10-30013 Visitors: 32
Filed: Jul. 09, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-30013 Document: 00511168322 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 9, 2010 No. 10-30013 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HEATH HILL, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:09-CR-156-1 Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Feder
More
     Case: 10-30013     Document: 00511168322          Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/09/2010




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                             July 9, 2010
                                     No. 10-30013
                                   Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HEATH HILL,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Louisiana
                              USDC No. 5:09-CR-156-1


Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Heath Hill has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Hill has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer