Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mary Miller v. North Mississippi Med Clinics, 11-60335 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 11-60335 Visitors: 46
Filed: Oct. 04, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-60335 Document: 00511621400 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 4, 2011 No. 11-60335 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MARY BRETT MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus NORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CLINICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi No. 1:10-CV-20 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judg
More
Case: 11-60335 Document: 00511621400 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 4, 2011 No. 11-60335 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MARY BRETT MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus NORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CLINICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi No. 1:10-CV-20 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary Miller sued her employer for sex and pregnancy discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment for the employer. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-60335 Document: 00511621400 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2011 No. 11-60335 The district court explained its ruling in a comprehensive Memorandum Opinion dated May 2, 2011. The court concluded, inter alia, that no similarly- situated employee was treated more favorably than was plaintiff. The court also concluded that, even if a prima facie case had been established, the employer brought forth a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision to prohibit Miller from working at a particular facility because of her disruptive behavior. The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer