Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-41457 Document: 00512347102 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-41457 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ISMAEL TORRES-FIGUEROA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1386-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Summary: Case: 12-41457 Document: 00512347102 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-41457 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ISMAEL TORRES-FIGUEROA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1386-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. P..
More
Case: 12-41457 Document: 00512347102 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2013
No. 12-41457
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ISMAEL TORRES-FIGUEROA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:12-CR-1386-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ismael Torres-Figueroa raises
an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez,
711
F.3d 541, 562 n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June 6, 2013)
(No. 12-10695), in which this court concluded that the generic, contemporary
definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not include the age-differential
requirement that Torres-Figueroa asserts is required. The appellant’s motion
for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.