Case: 13-40068       Document: 00512409153         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/16/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         October 16, 2013
                                     No. 13-40068
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SALVADOR TEJEDA-CORNELIO,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:12-CR-1536-1


Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Salvador Tejeda-
Cornelio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 

 (1967), and United States v. Flores,

 (5th Cir. 2011). Tejeda-Cornelio has filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein,
as well as Tejeda-Cornelio’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that
the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-40068   Document: 00512409153   Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/16/2013

                              No. 13-40068

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.




                                    2