Case: 15-20233      Document: 00513486585         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/29/2016




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 15-20233                                  FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                            April 29, 2016
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS BARRIOS-BELTRAN, also known as Jose L. Barrios, also known
as Jose Luiz Barrios, also known as Jose Barrios-Beltran, also known as Jose
Luis Barrios Beltran, also known as Jose Luis Beltran,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:14-CR-540


Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Barrios-
Beltran has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Barrios-Beltran has filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-20233      Document: 00513486585   Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/29/2016


                                 No. 15-20233

therein, as well as Barrios-Beltran’s response.     We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2