Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

George T. Daley v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 11067_1 (1950)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 11067_1 Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 20, 1950
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 182 F.2d 347 George T. DALEY, Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Appellee. No. 11067. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. April 20, 1950. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Paul Jones, Judge. Sindell & Sindell, Jack G. Day, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant. Thompson, Hine & Flory, Thomas E. Lipscomb, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This cause was heard upon the record, brie
More

182 F.2d 347

George T. DALEY, Appellant,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 11067.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 20, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Paul Jones, Judge.

Sindell & Sindell, Jack G. Day, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Thompson, Hine & Flory, Thomas E. Lipscomb, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This cause was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel;

2

And the Court being of the opinion that the ruling is controlled by Steinbeck v. John Hauck Brewing Co., 7 Ohio App. 18 and Turoff v. Richmond, 76 Ohio App. 83, 61 N.E.2d 486. See also: Den Braven v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co., 115 N.J.L. 543, 181 A. 46; Abar v. Ramsey Motor Service, 195 Minn. 597, 263 N.W. 917; Bennett v. McGoldrick-Sanderson Co., 15 Wash.2d 130, 142-144, 129 P.2d 795.

3

On the authority of said cases and for the reasons stated by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed. 90 F. Supp. 561.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer