Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Roofire Alarm Company v. Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc., 14060_1 (1966)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 14060_1 Visitors: 26
Filed: Oct. 11, 1966
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 375 F.2d 1012 ROOFIRE ALARM COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNDERWRITERS' LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. No. 14060. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. October 11, 1966. John A. Chambliss, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant. Miller, Martin, Hitching, Tipton & Lenihan, by Jere T. Tipton, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellee. Certiorari denied, 86 S. Ct. 863 . Before O'SULLIVAN, PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges. ORDER. 1 This cause having come on to be heard upon a pleading of the above named plai
More

375 F.2d 1012

ROOFIRE ALARM COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v.
UNDERWRITERS' LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant.

No. 14060.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

October 11, 1966.

John A. Chambliss, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant.

Miller, Martin, Hitching, Tipton & Lenihan, by Jere T. Tipton, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellee.

Certiorari denied, 86 S. Ct. 863.

Before O'SULLIVAN, PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon a pleading of the above named plaintiff entitled "Motion To Be Relieved Of Final Judgment," the brief in support thereof, and the brief of defendant in opposition thereto, and upon due consideration,

2

It is ordered that said motion may be, and it is, hereby denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer