Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Pearce, David R., 07-2046 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 07-2046 Visitors: 66
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Feb. 11, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NONPREDENTIAL DISPOSTITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted February 1, 2008 Decided February 11, 2008 Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ] Appeal from the United Plaintiff-Appellee, ] States District Court for ] the Northern District of No. 07-2046 v. ] Illinois, Western D
More
                         NONPREDENTIAL DISPOSTITION
                           To be cited only in accordance with
                                 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1




         United States Court of Appeals
                              For the Seventh Circuit
                              Chicago, Illinois 60604

                            Submitted February 1, 2008
                            Decided February 11, 2008


                                       Before

                   Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

                   Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

                   Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                    ]   Appeal from the United
         Plaintiff-Appellee,                 ]   States District Court for
                                             ]   the Northern District of
No. 07-2046                      v.          ]   Illinois, Western Division.
                                             ]
DAVID R. PEARCE,                             ]   No. 06 CR 50031
        Defendant-Appellant.                 ]
                                             ]   Philip G. Reinhard,
                                             ]        Judge.



       Counsel for the appellant in this case concedes that, unless the Supreme
Court should overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
(1998),
there is no basis for disturbing the judgment. Only the Supreme Court is entitled to
overrule one of its own decisions, so the appeal cannot succeed in this court. The
issue has been preserved for presentation to a higher tribunal.

                                                                  AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer