Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marcel Pop v. Eric Holder, Jr., 12-3214 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 12-3214 Visitors: 50
Filed: Feb. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 2 1 NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted January 31, 2013* Decided February 19, 2013 Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge No. 12-3214 On Petition for Review of an MARCEL POP, Order from the Board of Petitioner, Immigration Appeals. v. No. A071 030 710 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of th
More
2
1




                                  NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
                                    To be cited only in accordance with
                                             Fed. R. App. P. 32.1



                         United States Court of Appeals
                                         For the Seventh Circuit
                                         Chicago, Illinois 60604

                                        Submitted January 31, 2013∗
                                         Decided February 19, 2013


                                                   Before

                                    FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

                                    DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

                                    MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge


    No. 12-3214
                                                                     On Petition for Review of an
    MARCEL POP,                                                      Order from the Board of
         Petitioner,                                                 Immigration Appeals.

                    v.                                               No. A071 030 710

    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the
    United States,
          Respondent.


                                                    Order

           The petition for review is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Anaya-Aguilar v.
    Holder, 
683 F.3d 369
 (7th Cir. 2012).




    ∗ This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After
    examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R.
    App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer