Filed: Jul. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-3804 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Edward V. Burris, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: July 5, 2002 Filed: July 8, 2002 _ Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. A jury found Edward V. Burris guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district cour
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-3804 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Edward V. Burris, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: July 5, 2002 Filed: July 8, 2002 _ Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. A jury found Edward V. Burris guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 01-3804
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
v. * District of Missouri.
*
Edward V. Burris, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: July 5, 2002
Filed: July 8, 2002
___________
Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
A jury found Edward V. Burris guilty of being a felon in possession of a
firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court1 sentenced him to
46 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, Burris argues
that the government presented insufficient evidence to prove that he knowingly
possessed the firearm.
1
The HONORABLE NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, United States District Judge
for the Western District of Missouri.
We conclude that there was sufficient evidence--most notably, Burris’s signed
statement admitting that he carried the firearm for protection--for a reasonable jury
to conclude that Burris knowingly possessed the firearm. See United States v. Stroh,
176 F.3d 439, 440 (8th Cir. 1999); United States v. Balanga,
109 F.3d 1299, 1301
(8th Cir. 1997).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-