Filed: Oct. 07, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3097 _ Homer Buckles, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Bill Hedrick, Warden, U.S. Medical * Western District of Missouri. Center for Federal Prisoners, * [Unpublished] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 3, 2003 Filed: October 7, 2003 _ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM Federal inmate Homer Buckles, confined in the United States Medical Center for Federal Pris
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3097 _ Homer Buckles, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Bill Hedrick, Warden, U.S. Medical * Western District of Missouri. Center for Federal Prisoners, * [Unpublished] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 3, 2003 Filed: October 7, 2003 _ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM Federal inmate Homer Buckles, confined in the United States Medical Center for Federal Priso..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-3097
___________
Homer Buckles, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Bill Hedrick, Warden, U.S. Medical * Western District of Missouri.
Center for Federal Prisoners, * [Unpublished]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: October 3, 2003
Filed: October 7, 2003
___________
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM
Federal inmate Homer Buckles, confined in the United States Medical Center
for Federal Prisoners at Springfield, Missouri, appeals the district court’s dismissal
without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition as moot. We grant Buckles leave
to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We conclude the case is not moot because
the record does not foreclose all reasonable expectations that the alleged violation
could recur during Buckles’s incarceration. See County of Los Angeles v. Davis,
440
U.S. 625, 631 (1979); St. Louis Fire Fighters Ass’n Int’l Ass’n of Fire Fighters Local
73 v. City of St. Louis, Mo.,
96 F.3d 323, 329 (8th Cir. 1996). Nonetheless, Buckles
has not rebutted respondent’s evidence that Buckles failed to exhaust administrative
remedies. See 28 C.F.R. § 542 (2002); United States v. Chappel,
208 F.3d 1069,
1069-70 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal without prejudice, but
modify it to reflect that the dismissal is for Buckles’s failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
______________________________
-2-