Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Joshua M. Tilson, 04-3434 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 04-3434 Visitors: 75
Filed: Jul. 15, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 415 F.3d 815 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joshua M. TILSON, Appellant. No. 04-3434. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 21, 2004. Filed: July 15, 2005. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Counsel who represented the appellant was Gary E. Brotherton of Columbia, MO. Counsel who represented the appellee was David C. Jones, AUSA, of Springfield, MO. Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. MELLOY,
More

415 F.3d 815

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Joshua M. TILSON, Appellant.

No. 04-3434.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: October 21, 2004.

Filed: July 15, 2005.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Counsel who represented the appellant was Gary E. Brotherton of Columbia, MO.

Counsel who represented the appellee was David C. Jones, AUSA, of Springfield, MO.

Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

1

Joshua M. Tilson entered a guilty plea to unlawful transport of firearms and was sentenced to 180 months in prison. The judgment was entered on July 8, 2004, and his deadline to file a notice of appeal was due July 22, 2004. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); 26(a)(2). Defendant filed his motion to extend time to file notice of appeal on August 13, 2004. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(ii) (allowing the district court1 to extend the time to file a notice of appeal if the petitioner shows "excusable neglect or good cause"). The district court denied the motion.

2

We review a denial of a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal for an abuse of discretion. Gibbons v. United States, 317 F.3d 852, 853-54 (8th Cir.2003). We find there was no abuse of discretion below because Tilson failed to show excusable neglect or good cause for his filing delay. Further, even if we were to reach the merits of his appeal, Tilson would not be entitled to relief. Tilson seeks to appeal his sentence based on supposed judicial fact-finding in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004). Tilson's argument is that the district court should not have considered Tilson's three prior violent felonies in calculating his sentence. However, Blakely does not apply to the fact of a prior conviction. 124 S.Ct. at 2536. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.

Notes:

1

The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Court Judge for the Western District of Missouri

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer