Filed: Feb. 25, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1902 _ Michael J. Kriz, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. 12th Judicial District Board of * Mental Health of Box Butte County; * Dr. Sanat K. Roy, in his individual * [UNPUBLISHED] and official capacity, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 22, 2010 Filed: February 25, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Kriz appeals from t
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1902 _ Michael J. Kriz, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. 12th Judicial District Board of * Mental Health of Box Butte County; * Dr. Sanat K. Roy, in his individual * [UNPUBLISHED] and official capacity, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 22, 2010 Filed: February 25, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Kriz appeals from th..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1902
___________
Michael J. Kriz, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
12th Judicial District Board of *
Mental Health of Box Butte County; *
Dr. Sanat K. Roy, in his individual * [UNPUBLISHED]
and official capacity, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 22, 2010
Filed: February 25, 2010
___________
Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Kriz appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting summary
judgment to the defendants in Kriz's civil rights action. After careful de novo review,
see Mayer v. Nextel W. Corp.,
318 F.3d 803, 806 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert.
denied,
540 U.S. 823 (2003), we reject Kriz’s arguments for reversal because the
1
The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska.
summary judgment record reveals no trialworthy issue as to the alleged violation of
his constitutional rights. Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-