Filed: Feb. 08, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-2217 _ Lance Phillip Wickner, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Mike Green; Steve Ayers; * Kent Grandlienard; Mark Thielen, in * [UNPUBLISHED] their individual and official capacities, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 3, 2010 Filed: February 8, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Minnesota inmate Lance Phillip Wickner challeng
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-2217 _ Lance Phillip Wickner, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Mike Green; Steve Ayers; * Kent Grandlienard; Mark Thielen, in * [UNPUBLISHED] their individual and official capacities, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: February 3, 2010 Filed: February 8, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Minnesota inmate Lance Phillip Wickner challenge..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-2217
___________
Lance Phillip Wickner, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Mike Green; Steve Ayers; *
Kent Grandlienard; Mark Thielen, in * [UNPUBLISHED]
their individual and official capacities, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 3, 2010
Filed: February 8, 2010
___________
Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota inmate Lance Phillip Wickner challenges the order of the District
1
Court granting summary judgment to the Minnesota Department of Corrections
defendants, appellees here, in his suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Having carefully
reviewed the record and considered Wickner’s arguments, we find no basis for
reversal. See Murphy v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr.,
372 F.3d 979, 982 (8th Cir.) (de novo
1
The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
standard of review), cert. denied,
543 U.S. 991 (2004). Accordingly, we affirm the
District Court’s judgment.
______________________________
-2-