Filed: May 09, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 12-2424 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Frank Wilks lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: April 2, 2014 Filed: May 9, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Frank Wilks appeals the sentence imposed on him after pleading guilty to being a felo
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 12-2424 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Frank Wilks lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: April 2, 2014 Filed: May 9, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Frank Wilks appeals the sentence imposed on him after pleading guilty to being a felon..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 12-2424
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Frank Wilks
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: April 2, 2014
Filed: May 9, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Frank Wilks appeals the sentence imposed on him after pleading guilty to being
a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
Counsel has moved to withdraw, filing a brief under Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel argues that the district court erred in determining that
Wilks’s 1993 Missouri escape-from-custody conviction was a violent felony for
section 924(e) purposes. Wilks also alleges that the court failed to explain how it
applied the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors in determining the sentence and did not give
adequate weight to Wilks’s physical and mental health problems.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied. The case is remanded for further
consideration in light of United States v. Tucker,
740 F.3d 1177 (8th Cir. 2014) (en
banc).
______________________________
-2-