Filed: Aug. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-1479 _ Donald Felix Winnett lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. DeAngelo M. Earl, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Lorie A. Taylor, Hearing Officer, Arkansas Department of Correction lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: August 25, 2014 Filed: August 28, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and SHE
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-1479 _ Donald Felix Winnett lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. DeAngelo M. Earl, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Lorie A. Taylor, Hearing Officer, Arkansas Department of Correction lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: August 25, 2014 Filed: August 28, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and SHEP..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-1479
___________________________
Donald Felix Winnett
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
DeAngelo M. Earl, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Lorie A. Taylor,
Hearing Officer, Arkansas Department of Correction
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
____________
Submitted: August 25, 2014
Filed: August 28, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Arkansas inmate Donald Winnett appeals after
the district court1 adversely disposed of all of his claims. Upon careful de novo
review, we conclude that no error occurred. See Joseph v. Allen,
712 F.3d 1222,
1225 (8th Cir. 2013) (this court reviews district court’s grant of summary judgment
de novo, viewing all evidence and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of
nonmoving party; summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of
material fact and moving party is entitled to judgment as matter of law); Moore v.
Sims,
200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (preservice dismissals are
reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny
Winnett’s motion for appointed counsel.
______________________________
1
The Honorable D. P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth
Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-