Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

David Jeep v. Government of the U.S.A., 16-3221 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-3221 Visitors: 41
Filed: Dec. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3221 _ David Gerard Jeep, and heir lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Government of the United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: October 31, 2016 Filed: December 22, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. David Jeep filed a notice of appeal while t
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 16-3221
                         ___________________________

                             David Gerard Jeep, and heir

                         lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                             v.

                    Government of the United States of America

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
                                   ____________

                             Submitted: October 31, 2016
                              Filed: December 22, 2016
                                    [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

       David Jeep filed a notice of appeal while this action was pending. After careful
review, we dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction because Jeep’s notice
of appeal did not designate the order, judgment, or part thereof that he was appealing.
See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B) (notice of appeal must designate judgment, order, or
part thereof being appealed); Smith v. Barry, 
502 U.S. 244
, 248 (1992) (Rule 3
requirements are jurisdictional). We also deny as moot Jeep’s pending motion for
leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
                       ______________________________




                                      -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer