Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

National Labor Relations Board v. Edward Shannon, C. W. Shannon and Arthur F. Simpson, Doing Business as Shannon & Simpson Casket Company, 13644 (1956)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 13644 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 30, 1956
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 237 F.2d 855 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Edward SHANNON, C. W. Shannon and Arthur F. Simpson, doing business as Shannon & Simpson Casket Company, Respondents. No. 13644. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Oct. 30, 1956. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles Hackler, Director, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. James S. Duberg, Chula Vista, Cal., Holmes E. Hobart, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Before DENMAN, Ch
More

237 F.2d 855

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
Edward SHANNON, C. W. Shannon and Arthur F. Simpson, doing
business as Shannon & Simpson Casket Company, Respondents.

No. 13644.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 30, 1956.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles Hackler, Director, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

James S. Duberg, Chula Vista, Cal., Holmes E. Hobart, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and POPE, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Whereas, it is agreed by the parties that the respondents have to September 25, 1956 complied with our order of January 16, 1956, finding them in contempt for not complying with our decree of January 18, 1954, but providing that by compliance with the order they would be purged of contempt; and

2

Whereas, our decree of January 18, 1954 is a continuing order controlling the conduct of respondents in the future;

3

Now, Therefore, It Is Ordered that the respondents be deemed purged of the contempt for the particular violation found contemptuous by our order of January 16, 1956, 9 Cir., 229 F.2d 652.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer