Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NOMADIX, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, CV09-08441 DDP (VBKx). (2013)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20130304627 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2013
Summary: [PROPOSED ] ORDER AMENDING PROTECTIVE ORDERS CONCERNING NOMADIX AND HEWLETT-PACKARD VICTOR B. KENTON, District Judge. ORDER Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company has produced documents in this case to plaintiff Nomadix, Inc. HP produced the vast majority of these documents pursuant to the protective orders that the Court entered at Docket Nos. 205 and 209, which dictate when Nomadix must return or destroy such documents. HP and Nomadix have agreed to extend these deadlines. Accordingly, based
More

[PROPOSED]ORDER AMENDING PROTECTIVE ORDERS CONCERNING NOMADIX AND HEWLETT-PACKARD

VICTOR B. KENTON, District Judge.

ORDER

Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company has produced documents in this case to plaintiff Nomadix, Inc. HP produced the vast majority of these documents pursuant to the protective orders that the Court entered at Docket Nos. 205 and 209, which dictate when Nomadix must return or destroy such documents. HP and Nomadix have agreed to extend these deadlines.

Accordingly, based upon the agreement of HP and Nomadix, and for good cause, the protective orders entered at Docket Nos. 205 and 209 are amended as follows for situations in which HP is the Producing Party and Nomadix is the Receiving Party:

1. The ninety-day deadline of paragraph 30 of Docket No. 205 is reset to ninety (90) calendar days after both this action (case no. CV09-08441 DDP (VBKx)) and the SolutionInc action (case no. CV10-00381 DDP (VBKx)) have been fully resolved with respect to all defendants through settlement or exhaustion of all appeals from orders and final judgments.

2. The 120-day deadline of paragraph 30 of Docket No. 205 is reset to thirty (30) calendar days after the revised ninety-day deadline set forth in paragraph 1 of this order.

3. Paragraph 22 of Docket No. 209 is amended such that HP may give notice pursuant to that paragraph only after both this action (case no. CV09-08441 DDP (VBKx)) and the SolutionInc action (case no. CV10-00381 DDP (VBKx)) have been fully resolved with respect to all defendants through settlement or exhaustion of all appeals from orders and final judgments.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer