Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jorge Luis Valdez v. Molina, ED CV 15-0805 DOC (RAO). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180110778 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Dkt. No. 159); Plaintiff's Resubmitted Request for Appointment of Counsel (Dkt. No. 175); all of the other records and files herein; and the Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation ("Amended Report"). The time for filing objections to the Amended Report has passed
More

ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Dkt. No. 159); Plaintiff's Resubmitted Request for Appointment of Counsel (Dkt. No. 175); all of the other records and files herein; and the Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation ("Amended Report"). The time for filing objections to the Amended Report has passed and no objections have been received.1 The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions for Appointment of Case 5:15-cv-00805-DOC-RAO Document 183 Filed 01/08/18 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:3088 Counsel are DENIED.

FootNotes


1. On December 11, 2017, Plaintiff constructively filed an objection to the initial Report and Recommendation, which was received by the Court after the Amended Report issued. (Dkt. No. 182.) In the objection, Plaintiff simply states that he "respectfully objects to the recommendation made by the honorable Magistrate Judge." (Id.)
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer