Kong v. Shirazi-Fard, CV 18-2933-JFW (FFMx). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190424784
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . The Court, having granted Defendants Shamsi Shirazi-Fard's ("Shirazi-Fard") and Michael Christoforakis's ("Christoforakis") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Request to Decline Supplemental Jurisdiction over State Claims and denied Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong's ("Kong") Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment based on its determination that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defend
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . The Court, having granted Defendants Shamsi Shirazi-Fard's ("Shirazi-Fard") and Michael Christoforakis's ("Christoforakis") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Request to Decline Supplemental Jurisdiction over State Claims and denied Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong's ("Kong") Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment based on its determination that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defenda..
More
JUDGMENT
JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge.
The Court, having granted Defendants Shamsi Shirazi-Fard's ("Shirazi-Fard") and Michael Christoforakis's ("Christoforakis") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Request to Decline Supplemental Jurisdiction over State Claims and denied Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong's ("Kong") Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment based on its determination that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defendants Shirazi-Fard and Christoforakis were entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Kong's first cause of action for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 against them, and the Court having declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Kong's second cause of action for violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act and dismissed it without prejudice,
IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that judgment is entered in this action as follows:
1. Plaintiff Kong shall recover nothing from Shirazi-Fard or Christoforakis;
2. Shirazi-Fard and Christoforakis shall have judgment in their favor on Kong's first cause of action for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; and
3. Shirazi-Fard and Christoforakis shall recover from Kong their costs of suit in the sum of $________.
Source: Leagle
