Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Davis v. Stiny, CV-17-8584-R. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190528734 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 23, 2019
Latest Update: May 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY LACK OF PROSECUTION MANUEL L. REAL , District Judge . Plaintiff was ORDERED to show cause in writing no later than April 13, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. On April 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Response to the Order to Show Cause stating that a Motion to Amend Complaint was filed simultaneously with the Response. On May 21, 2018, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint was denied. Thereafter, no further action was taken by Plaint
More

ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff was ORDERED to show cause in writing no later than April 13, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. On April 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Response to the Order to Show Cause stating that a Motion to Amend Complaint was filed simultaneously with the Response. On May 21, 2018, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint was denied. Thereafter, no further action was taken by Plaintiff; and, as of the date of this Order, no proof of service or further response has been filed.

WHEREAS, the period has elapsed without proper service of the complaint and summons within the time frame allowed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m); and, the period has elapsed without any good cause shown to warrant an extension;

The Court hereby DISMISSES this instant action for lack of prosecution.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer