Rust v. Chino Prison Healthcare Providers, 5:17-cv-00556-JA K-KES. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190531896
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 29, 2019
Latest Update: May 29, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that (a) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 66) is granted as to Plaintiff's (i) Eighth Amendment claims against Drs. Vu and Farooq arising out of their alleged failure to protect him from LVN Warfield, (ii) Eighth Amendment claim against Dr. Vu arising out of the failure to provide Plaintiff with a cervical pillow,
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that (a) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 66) is granted as to Plaintiff's (i) Eighth Amendment claims against Drs. Vu and Farooq arising out of their alleged failure to protect him from LVN Warfield, (ii) Eighth Amendment claim against Dr. Vu arising out of the failure to provide Plaintiff with a cervical pillow, ..
More
JUDGMENT
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,
IT IS ADJUDGED that (a) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 66) is granted as to Plaintiff's (i) Eighth Amendment claims against Drs. Vu and Farooq arising out of their alleged failure to protect him from LVN Warfield, (ii) Eighth Amendment claim against Dr. Vu arising out of the failure to provide Plaintiff with a cervical pillow, and (iii) First Amendment claim against Dr. Vu arising out of his alleged retaliation against Plaintiff failing to provide him with a cervical pillow;
IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED that all of Plaintiff's other federal claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and
IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's claims sounding in state law (if any) are dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff pursuing those claims in state court.
Source: Leagle
